Something they should consider reporting it. So I understand that this is the problem to get Jabref running on my system. Also the installers from Orable or AdoptOpenJDK, or rather Temurin have higher requirements. My doubt is that if it is the same to install JDK and use it to create a program, or if it is the same to simply run a program created with that version of JDK. So I understand that any program that requires it should also need to run on 10.14 or higher as well. I visited that same link the other day, and as they explain JDK17 requires 10.14 or higher in order to be installed. Or maybe try other options like Mendeley, Zotero or others. ![]() It’s as if they assume that EVERYONE is using the LATEST version of everything, at any given time.Īt the moment I have reinstalled the previous version and tried to use it for a while. It’s something I don’t get on a lot of shows lately. ![]() It avoids wasting the user’s time, but also the programmers responding to problems that are not. And if you don’t comply with them, it’s going to work badly. To avoid submitting complaints about it not working, when it turns out that the requirements are what they are. It is something that I have not been able to find, and I understand that many will find it very opportune to meet them. In addition to reporting it, just in case it was an inadvertent bug, my intention was to request that the help page should report on those requirements, whatever they are. Rather, I understand that some of the used libraries or other options is what forces us to upload requirements. I had previously tested the package with the disk image (dmg), and I assume that the pkg will be similar to the result. Both with the prohibited symbol and generating a system message informing about it. Hi, thanks for replying, but I’m afraid you still need a system higher than 10.12, at least the two versions I’ve seen: 5.6 and 5.7 in the portable package for mac. One of the reasons for using free and open source software is precisely that: to be able to use “old-fashioned” systems without the problem generated by paid programs, which even if you pay, do not offer you a functional version in your system. And if different versions are also linked for each system, it would be much more useful and interesting. I would like them to continue supporting my system (and previous ones), but I understand that it is not feasible with the time that has passed since its launch and its obsolescence. ![]() Not everyone is using the latest OS version or machines this year, and that’s a basic piece of information to inform users whether or not they can use the program. In addition, I have not been able to find any reference to the minimum requirements of the application on the web either. ![]() I understand that if this new version is not compatible, the program should not warn about it, or at most simply a message that it exists, but that it will not be compatible and I have to update the mac first before being able to install it. In fact, the application includes the prohibited symbol. Well, that, I had version 5.5 installed and seeing the new version notice in the program, I downloaded it from the web, both the dmg and the installer and both install a version that is incompatible with my 10.11 system.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |